Says it’s a better way to learn

In regard to “Virtual frogs inspire real learning” (Oct. 2), it’s wonderful that St. Mary Magdalen School’s Julio Tellez is utilizing modern science learning tools that save animals’ lives and provide his students with an educational experience that is relevant for the 21st century.

Nearly every published comparative study has concluded that non-animal learning tools, such as virtual dissection software, teach anatomy and complex biological processes as well as, or better than, animal dissection. These methods are also often associated with increased learning efficiency and higher examination results, student confidence and satisfaction.

Last year, the National Science Teachers Association even amended its official position statement to approve the use of non-animal methods as replacements for animal dissection.

Unfortunately, despite the wide availability and unquestionable effectiveness of these humane learning methods, more than 10 million animals are still killed and used for classroom dissections each year. Some are taken from their homes in the wild. Others come from breeding facilities that cater to businesses that use animals in experiments, and many are lost or abandoned animal companions who are sold by animal shelters to biological supply companies.

All teachers should take the lead of Mr. Tellez by utilizing humane learning methods that expose students to the most effective, ethical science available and teach them that all animals, including those who are smaller, furrier and slimier than we are, deserve respect.
Justin Goodman
Norfolk, Va.

Goodman is the research as sociate supervisor, Laboratory Investigations Department of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.